Dreaming of a white Georgia

Today, the unthinkable happened: it snowed in Georgia. Not just sleet, mind you, but real snow, with real, fat, white snowflakes. And not only that, but it has been snowing on and off since 11 this morning. Although life as we know it down here has pretty much come to a screeching halt because of this, it is a little miracle. I've posted some pictures and a video below - break out the hot chocolate and enjoy!

Our house in the snow (husband-dear on the front porch in his robe, but more about that later)

A snowy street

Palm tree in the front yard. We're not sure if the poor baby will make it after this winter.

Zoe was slightly confused at first, what is all this white stuff everywhere, and why is it in our yard?

Yes, I go a little nuts when it snows, and yes I was still wearing my PJs at 11 in the morning. I have to add that is highly unusual for me (or us, as husband-dear was still in his PJs too), since we usually feel obligated to knock out an insane exercise regime on Sunday mornings. The snow made it impossible for us to ride our bikes, so we had a very welcome excuse to lie around the house and watch the snow come down.


And it was really cold outside, so once mommy got her picture taken, it was time to hurry back in. Apparently, Zoe thought so too.




And good luck to everyone up north, who has real snow to deal with.

Going native

"We are the Borg. You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."
Any Star Trek episode

Last Wednesday, I was trying to explain to my students why it is important to adapt your lingo that of your interviewee. Since I am the queen of examples, I quickly searched for a way to explain this, and started, ever enthusiastic, as follows; "Imagine being from the south, and interviewing someone from Maine, and then saying..."
I fell silent, as I drew a complete blank. I could not, for the life of me, think of a typical southern term or expression. None. When I told husband-dear about this later that night, he said; "Not even y'all?"Nope. Not even y'all.
So I stood there for a few moments, and then could do nothing but say, much to the merriment of my students, "OK, wow, this is bad. I have now officially become a southerner, because I can't think of one typical southern expression. They all seem normal to me."
Finally, the only, somewhat lame, term I could come up with was "greens", a term that budding social scientists will of course be using extremely often. Fortunately, I was able to come up with an example from my own history of interviewing people, and thus clarify my point that way. But in spite of that, the little incident kept nagging at the back of my head.

Have I finally gone native? On my way home that day. I considered that option. I looked at the highway, the other cars, and the various bare cottonfields, rib shacks, pawn shops, and other local curiosities that I passed on my way, and realized to my dismay that none of them had me look twice. I remember driving along that country highway and scribbling notes for this blog on a piece of paper. I hunted through my purse (yes, I'm still driving at this point, another sure sign of becoming one of them"), found the notepad, and realized that none of the notes could inspire me to write a blog now. Billboards? Those big ugly signs that are a fact of life down here? What's there to write about? They're big and ugly. Done. The funny things you see on semis? Who cares about that? The way the cotton looks like snow when it's in full bloom? Well, maybe. It was an unsettling realization. Does becoming more southern mean I will now do and say all the things I thought were hilarious, outdated, or plain odd a few years ago, and not even realize it?

On the other hand, if I want to make this my home, then remaining a critical outsider will do me little good. Can you belong and be critical at the same time? That's also called cognitive dissonance, and I'm going to say what I tell my students when I teach them about that concept: no you can't maintain dissonance without losing your mind. I need my mind to keep my job, so obviously that's not an option.

But then this morning, as I was driving to the base pool, I witnessed another one of those spectacular southern sunsets. One where the whole sky seems to be on fire in hues of orange, pink, and blue, with colors stretching as far as your eyes can see. Somehow you never see those in Europe. Maybe that's because there's always some building blocking your view, or because you're further north, I don't know. But what I did realize right then is that as long as you realize how different and special the place you live and the people there are, you don't really "go native". Perhaps time does shave the edges off any criticism, and possibly it will become harder to write scathing pieces about the local idiosyncrasies. But that doesn't have to mean that you have no option but to become one of the locals, start saying "y'all", listening to country music, wearing mom-jeans, and perming your hair. Thank goodness. But do forgive me if I say "greens" and "cuss", and pass on the right from time to time.

Gek

“Ik word gek, harstikke gek, helemaal gek...”
Brigitte Kaandorp ~ Brigitte: De Musical

Soms weet ik het, net als Brigitte, even niet meer. Dan begin ik me zelfs serieus af te vragen of ik misschien gewoon degene ben die ze niet allemaal op een rijtje heeft. Ik bedoel, ben ik nou gek, maar waarom vinden de studenten hier dat ik ervoor verantwoordelijk ben dat zij zich gemotiveerd voelen?

Deze week is, zoals ik al eerder schreef, de week van de midterms, de tentamens die midden in het semester gegeven worden. En dit semester lijkt dit halfwegpunt een nog groter drama dan voorgaande jaren. Het toppunt was tijdens mijn “Senior Project” college. In dit college moeten de studenten de ruwe versie van hun afstudeerproject bij het midterm inleveren, zodat ik hun voortgang kan beoordelen. Een theoretisch goed idee, alleen hebben dit semester acht van de tien studenten niks ingeleverd. En toen ik ze daarop wees, en opmerkte dat ik niet vond dat ze hun best deden, riep een van de studenten; “And how are we supposed to feel motivated if you tell us we’re not trying?! We are trying, and you make us feel like crap this way!”

Dat was eentje die ik nog nooit gehoord had. En na enig denken werd het me duidelijk; ik word hier als docent verwacht mijn studenten te motiveren. Dat is iets nieuws voor mij, als ik eerlijkben. Natuurlijk probeer ik mijn studenten enthousiast te krigen voor hun werk, ze te motiveren om steeds beter hun best te doen. Maar ik ben zelf niet van de overtuiging dat mensen motiveren betekent dat je ze niet de waarheid kan vertellen. In mijn mening horen mijn studenten zichzelf te motiveren. Zij hebben een bepaald doel voor ogen, afstuderen, een carriere, verder studeren, het maakt niet uit. En daarin horen ze, in mijn mening, zichzelf te enthousiasmeren. Ik zal ze aanjuichen en bijsturen indien nodig, maar daar houdt mijn rol op. Mijn studenten zijn het daar dus niet mee eens.

Na enige navraag onder collegae ben ik er achter dat zij dit ook zo ervaren, en het, net zoals ik, een erg vreemd uitgangspunt vinden. Studenten op de universiteit horen zichzelf te sturen, het is ten slotte geen high school meer.

Dus hoe komt dit dan? En waarom is het zo anders dan in Europa? Of zelfs in andere delen van de VS? Misschien komt het omdat hier in het zuiden meer een “coddle” cultuur heerst; een cultuur waarin kinderen bij alles volledig aan de hand genomen worden. Zo valt het mij wel eens op dat veel van de “lokale” ouders hier ontzettend veel voor hun kinderen doen. Is een kind zijn of haar lunch vergeten? Dan komt moeders het naar school brengen. Moet Sue-Lynn of Steve een groot project doen, en is kindlief te laat begonnen, dan gaan alle hens aan dek en helpen papa en mama mee, desnoods tot ‘s avonds laat, om het alsnog in orde te maken. Ook scholen lijken soms mee te doen. Er zijn regels voor werkelijk alles; van kleding, tot taalgebruik, tot gedrag in de cafeteria, tot wat mee te nemen naar de les, tot het wel of niet naar de WC mogen. En deze staan allemaal stuk voor stuk beschreven in pagina’s tellende student handbooks. En een klas overdoen als het niet goed gaat? Dat gebeurt hier in Georgia al helemaal niet. Niet alleen is dat slecht voor de naam van de school, welke op “graduation rates” beoordeeld wordt, maar het zou ook heel slecht zijn voor het ego van het kind.

Laat ik wel duidelijk zijn; ik heb helemaal geen probleem met duidelijke regels. Ik weet graag waar ik, en de kinderen aan toe zijn. En ook al zijn manlief en ik niet van het “coddling parenting”, en hebben we kinderen regelmatig zonder handschoenen, muts, of lunch naar school gestuurd als ze deze kwijt, of vergeten waren, we zullen ze heus wel helpen als er weer eens een of ander crea bea project op stapel staat.

Maar waar ik wel een probleem mee heb, of denk te hebben, is dat zo veel verantwoordelijkheid bij de kinderen zelf weggenomen wordt. Ze worden overal door anderen doorheen gelaveerd, zonder zelf over na te hoeven denken (“is het beleefd om midden in de les naar de WC te gaan?”) of verantwoordelijkheid te hoeven nemen (“ach, ik ben mijn jas kwijt, mama koopt wel een nieuwe”). En dan krijg je volgens mij studenten die dus verwachten dat hun professor ze, net als hun ouders en leerkrachten op school, overal doorheen sleept. Want dat is, zoals zij het zelf regelmatig tegen mij zeggen, mijn baan.

Nu is mijn baan, volgens mij, studenten iets bij te brengen over mijn vak. Om ze te stimuleren na te denken, en zichzelf elke keer te overtreffen. Om ze, a la Vygotsky, uit hun comfort zone te halen, en ze zo tot een bepaald niveau van functioneren te krijgen. Maar ik ben niet verantwoordelijk voor hun success. Of hun motivatie. Die moeten ze zelf verzorgen.

Maar ja, misschien ben ik toch wel gek.

A nerd and midterms

When I was in school, I truly liked taking finals and midterms. No, I did not like the days or weeks of studying in advance. I also did not very much care for the waiting right before the final, those few moments in which you’re running everything through your head one more time, fighting the urge to dive into your bag and check in your book. But once I was sitting in that chair, opened the exam, and read through the questions in a preliminary scan, I hit the “exam-zone”. My mind was clear, focused, and as I would pen quick notes in the margins of the test paper, I felt like a runner hitting their stride. And even if I didn’t know all of the answers right away, an incredible peacefulness would envelop me every time. This is where I needed to be, and this is what I needed to be doing, so I better do it. In fact, I used to get so caught up in what I was doing, apparently entire bookbags could fall of chairs, people could be coughing their heads off, or arguing with the professor about something, albeit in whispered undertones, and I would not have a clue. I never even felt the urge to use the bathroom, until after the final, when the pains in my stomach would have sprinting to the nearest bathroom. During finals, I was in a bubble. A bubble which was no one was ever really aware of, until one notorious occasion at my Dutch university. For one of my upper-level classes, the professor had prepared a few of the finals in English for our foreign students. They had accidentally been placed on top, and so I, not the foreign student at the back of the line, received one. Of all the students to whom a final in a foreign language could have been given, I, the one who spent numerous years at American schools, was probably the worst. I didn’t even give it a second thought, and started scribbling my first answer to the open question. In English. It wasn’t until I was bicycling home with a friend, that I started to wonder about that. The professor thought it was hilarious, although the two foreign students did not find it equally funny.

Now that I administer my own finals and midterms, I can’t help but wonder if any of my students enjoy the rush of taking exams. If any of them go into a zone of feverished writing and thinking. Academics seem so different from when I was a student. These students seem surprised when I tell them that, no, they cannot wear their IPods while taking their finals. We had just made it into the portable CD-era when I was in college. Because someone’s phone will always go off, I have all my students place their cellphones on my desk. Besides the fact that my generation, obviously, did not own cellphones, I always marvel at the fact that some of those phones have features that, back then, I couldn’t have even imagined. My students seem a lot more preoccupied with other things; rush, parties, steplines, and the social life of the dorms, than I ever was.

But in spite of all those differences, I still see a very familiar gleam light up some students’ eyes right before a final. Their mouths become one straight line, they stop talking and laughing, and stare off into space until they’re holding the test in their hands. Then they dive into the paper, their pens scribbling furious notes while they consider all the questions and what they could write. These are the students whose papers are filled with paragraphs of mind-numblingly precise detail and who use the backs of their tests for notes. Students who really don’t re-read their answers after they’ve written them. Why should they, after having extensively outlined their answer first? Students who don’t look up when someone walks in late, and who don’t ever smile when handing in their final. Of course. It is a very serious business after all.

Midterms are fun.

And I’m getting old.

Office wisdoms

As I was cleaning out my computer, I came across a whole series of documents that contained nothing but quotes, wisdoms, and lyrics that adorned a wall in one of the various offices I have occupied over the past years. Some are still up on my wall today, others I had all but forgotten about, and reflect a long-ago past. However, I thought I select the oddest, funniest, and most inspirational here. Perhaps they will adorn some of your walls, or if not that, they will at least provide everyone a little joy, and make you all wonder about what really does go on inside my head.

Deep and supposedly mind-engaging quotes:
"But the reason I call myself by my childhood name is to remind myself that a scientist must also be absolutely like a child. If he sees a thing, he must say that he sees it, whether it was what he thought he was going to see or not. See first, think later, then test. But always see first. Otherwise you will only see what you were expecting. Most scientists forget that.
Wonke the Sane, “So long and thanks for all the fish”

In the offensive category:
"This isn’t an office; it’s hell with fluorescent lighting."
"Well, this day was a total waste of make-up. "
"Sarcasm is just one more service we offer. "
"Can I trade this job for what’s behind door 1? "
"And which dwarf are you? "
"Do NOT start with me, you will NOT win. "
"I’m multi-talented, I can talk and piss you off at the same time. "
“Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.”
“I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a darn.”
“Ahhh...I see the screw-up fairy has visited us again...”
(Needless to say, I went through an obvious 'angry young woman' phase)

Inspirational:
"Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius power and magic to it. Begin now." Jonathan Goethe (1749-1832)

"Don't think! Thinking is the enemy of creativity. It's self-conscious, and anything self-conscious
is lousy. You can't try to do things. You simply must do things." Ray Bradbury.

“May the road rise to meet you,
May the wind be always at your back.
May the sun shine warm upon your face,
The rains fall soft upon your fields.
And until we meet again,
May God hold you in the palm of his hand.”

“Toen ze de communisten kwamen halen
heb ik niets gezegd
ik was geen communist.
Toen ze de vakbondsleden kwamen halen
heb ik niets gezegd
ik was geen vakbondslid.
Toen ze de joden kwamen halen
heb ik niets gezegd
ik was geen jood.
Toen ze de katholieken kwamen halen
heb ik niets gezegd.
ik was geen katholiek.
Toen kwamen ze mij halen
en er was niemand meer om iets te zeggen. Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)”

“Never be bullied into silence. Never allow yourself to be made a victim. Accept no one's definition of your life, define yourself. Harvey Fierstein"


Just plain odd:
"Meandering to a different drummer."
“The light at the end of the tunnel has been temporarily shut down due to financial difficulties”
“Who me? I just wander from room to room.”
"Karate Wisdom:
Watch out for those people half your size; they are twice as familiar as you are with the ground, and tend to be eager to introduce you."

And the quote which hung over my desk for about six years:

"It is sometimes a mistake to climb
it is always a mistake never to even make the attempt.
If you do not climb, you will not fall. This is true.
But is it that bad to fail, that hard to fall?
Sometimes you wake, and sometimes, yes, you die.
But there is a third alternative.
And sometimes, when you fall, you learn to fly."

So there you have it. A little insight into DixieChick's warped mind. Enjoy!

The Spring Faculty Conference

For the longest time we were led to believe that we were going to escape this semester’s pep-talk-administrative- update meeting known as the semi-annual faculty conference. There had been no announcements before Christmas break, and right up until the beginning of the Spring semester there was not a peep about a possible conference. Most faculty breathed a sigh in relief. Although the administration loves these conferences as an occasion to showcase the wonderful achievements of our university and bring every one together as a “united spirited academic community”, many faculty don’t quite share their sentiments. In spite of understanding the need to communicate pertinent information to all employees, the faculty tend to think of long-winded speeches with endless power point presentations as taking away from time that should have been spent on preparing classes, meeting with students, conducting research, or generally doing what they are being paid to do. So when there was no sign of a spring conference, most people raised their eyebrows, but decided not to bring it up lest they should give someone an idea.

However, the fact that I am sitting in a full auditorium, listening to the Vice President talk about impending budget cuts, proves that our approach was less than successful. Mid-January, the administration decided the current developments on the state level were sufficiently ominous to warrant a university-wide faculty conference. And having listened to some of the recent developments, I can’t blame them. The bad news? We’re facing massive, enormous, positively staggering budget cuts. Every economic bump in the road leads legislators to treat education as the evil stepchild that should have been thrown out years ago, and this time around it’s no different. The state is considering a 10% budget cut, and is debating the possibility of furloughs. There will be no raises for the next two years, and a 100% hiring freeze has been put in place. The good news? Our university considers pink slipping anyone a non-option. For the time being anyway. Perhaps it’s due to the fact that we have a fairly decent amount of alumni donations come in, or maybe it’s because HBCUs like ours were founded on the principles of standing together during times of adversity. I don’t know. But I am very grateful. Not just because I have a mortgage payment to make, and kids to put through college, but also because I can’t imagine my life without teaching. I’ll take a furlough, I’ll even take a paycut if it comes to that, heck, I would take on a second job if need be, but just let me teach.

But the conference isn’t all doom and gloom. Perhaps it would have been had we been in the Netherlands, where even the most progressive universities tend to have a Calvinist-glass-half-empty approach. But we are in the US, at an HBCU, in the south, and so there is plenty of optimism. Our President called it just another glitch on the road to preeminence. Now I’m not entirely sure about us being on the road to anything quite that fancy, but I appreciate the upbeat attitude. The president started off today’s conference with a speech that almost a command to believe in a positive outcome. He phrased it as follows:

“Keep in mind the Jesus who laughed. Keep in mind our ancestors who laughed. Keep in mind our founders who laughed. Keep in mind all the professors who came before you and who lived through Jim Crow, the Great War, the Great Depression, World War Two, segregation, lynchings, the civil rights movement, the Vietnam war, another recession, another war, and who laughed all the way through. When I walk by an office or a classroom and I see people laughing, I know we are doing our jobs right. Because when you laugh, you acknowledge that we will make it through this. We are, after all, called the Unsinkable!”

Never mind that we are a public school, that many of the faculty members are not religious, that some of them are not born US citizens, or were born long after many of the above-mentioned events, or the fact that at least 10% of the faculty is not African American, the president had an auditorium filled with critical and at times cynical academics cheering in appreciation.

And even I, your usually somewhat cynical Dutch closet-Calvinist, was cheering and laughing. What else is there to do? You can mope and worry about college funds, bills, and vacation, but that is not going to magically improve our current economic situation. You might as well smile and be merry, and enjoy what you do have while you have it. And I do honestly think we will be okay. Like our university, I think we’re all a little bit unsinkable.

“Members of the jury…”

"...have you reached a verdict?”

I have to admit that although I admire the brilliant simplicity of the American judicial system, I have never quite gotten used to the idea of a jury made up of laypeople like you and me determining the outcome of every imaginable criminal trial. Sure, I learned about the sixth and fourteenth Amendment it in 10th grade US History, and then again in 12th Honors Government. I understand that the principle behind the concept of a jury is that everyone is tried by a group of people who reflect a cross-section of the community; i.e, a group of “one’s peers”. I can even understand why this may seem a more reliable form of justice than a system whereby a single Judge decides on a case. But I still don’t worry that a trial by jury is simply not as reliable or accurate as a trial overseen by multiple judges, as currently is the case in the Netherlands.

Can we really depend on a jury to come to a fair, unbiased, and well-founded decision? To be honest, I don’t know. And for all the prattling I do about the use of topic sentences, proper grammar, and understanding world history, I’m not worried about that. I don’t care if people are smart, or even educated. I worry about people being biased, or worse, prejudiced. Now sure, you could argue that with a proper cross-section of the community, one should, technically speaking, have a jury that represents every possible political and religious views in the country. If you live further North or West, I will venture that perhaps that is an actual possibility. However, down here, far in the deep south, it is actually possible that you get a jury made up of nothing but semi-racist white people. And if you’re an African American male up for a crime committed against a white person, I can guarantee you you’re up a certain creek without a paddle.

Now let’s, for argument’s sake, assume that you can assemble a jury of relatively reasonable people. There’s a few men, a few women, some African Americans, a couple of white people, maybe a Latino or two, and a fair representation of the different religious beliefs in your reasonable jury. But in that case, I can’t help but wonder about all those studies out there about people’s limited ability to perceive, process, and retain information. Numerous studies have proven that people have a hard time remembering information that is not line with previously developed ideas. One study carried out in the 1940s proved that the majority of the people on a plane who witnessed a white man starting a fight, actually remembered an innocent black passenger as throwing the first punch. That scares me. And how about people tuning out? I know that sitting through grad school gave me a massive attention span, but that in spite of that even I tune out from time to time. Especially when I think I know what someone is going to say. Imagine that happening on a jury. Now I’m not saying this won’t happen to a Judge, but at least they have been trained to do this type of work.

Anyway, this is a very long and roundabout way to talk about the fact that Keith, one of my co-workers, was called up for jury duty this week. He had received the letter a few weeks earlier and was so excited he could barely see straight. Although Keith is a bleeding-heart liberal who lives to criticize anyone in power, he did honestly seem to want to serve his country. But more than that, he also has a very stressful job. Hence, Keith was also very much looking forward to getting away from the students, the administrators, the staff, and everyone else who pesters him on a daily basis. He had a series of books lined up he wanted to read during the selection process, and he and I spent many enjoyable coffee breaks speculating about the kind of case he had been called up for. He wondered about the possibility of being sequestered, while I wondered how many brands of fancy coffee creamer he could buy with the $25 he would be earning per day. What would it be like to serve on a jury in a part of the world that is not known for its open-mindedness? Keith was sure he would be selected, if only because he would be the only Democrat around.

So on Monday, as he left to report to the courthouse, I wished him a good time, but secretly hoped he would not stay away too long as our Department is horribly overworked with him there. But I had not expected the call thirty minutes later. There had been a plea-bargain, so there was no need for a jury after all. Keith was not a happy man. After all, his quiet time had just evaporated. As had my inside scoop on the American jury system. My heartfelt apologies to you, the reader. We'll just have to wait until Keith receives another letter. I'll keep you posted.